Saints and Soldiers

Saints and Soldiers Review

Year: 2003

Rating: PG-13

Overall Evaluation: 9.5

Significance

Suppositions

Story

Style

10.0 / 10

10.0 / 10

9.0 / 10

10.0 / 10

Click HERE for evaluation criteria.

Saints and Soldiers Review


Style

Rated PG-13 for war violence and related images (). There is almost no foul language at all and it is completely void of sex, sexual innuendo, or perversion of any kind. No gratuitous gore either. Very clean, yet oddly believable, for a war movie.

Story

This is a "based on a true story" account of four soldiers who join together after escaping the Malmedy Massacre during the Battle of the Bulge in WWII. They find themselves behind enemy lines,and are basically trying to decide how to get to safety when they find a downed British pilot who has important information for the allies regarding the offensive. So now, instead of simply surviving or sneaking back to allied command they chase the germans in an attempt to beat them to the front. It is a compilation of true stories, I have read that even the meeting of the American missionary-turned-soldier and the quasi-traitorous German soldier was taken from a real event.

Suppositions

The basic story is believable and the interaction between the characters very intriguing. Nothing objectionable world view wise. It exemplifies the kind of virtues that were common before the sexual revolution generation ruined America.

Significance

There are several interesting dialogues in the movie - especially between the hero and one of the other soldiers on the subject of God. In one scene a very telling conversation ensues regarding two similar situations that had radically different effects on each of the men's faith (or lack thereof). It clearly illustrates the fact that fallen man sees more and more evidence for atheism by interpreting events in light of that starting point. The film's themes include the existence of God amidst suffering and evil, the nature of man in war (who is the real enemy?). This is all well done and not over the top.

As a side note I was surprised (but not much) to discover that this film was made by Mormons. I did not pick up on it at all and this, by the way, is how Christian films should affect people. It delivered a quality message without appealing only to other Christians. My "cult radar" did not go off for the following reasons:

1. No particular Mormon doctrine is mentioned.
2. The hero carries what appears to be a Bible - not a "Book of Mormon".
3. The hero's nickname is "Deacon" not "Elder" (the Mormon term for a missionary).
4. The hero said he was a missionary but most Christian denominations use that title so it's not obvious he meant a Mormon missionary.
5. The title is also not as dead a give away as one might think for the same reasons as 4.