|
50
First Dates

Year:
2004
Rating:
PG-13
Overall
Evaluation: 6.5
|
Significance
Suppositions
Story
Style
|
9.0 / 10
6.0 / 10
7.0 / 10
3.0 / 10
|
Click
HERE for evaluation
criteria.
|
|
Style
Unfortunately
this PG-13 film is rife with gross-out humor, for crude sexual situations
and statements (some homosexual), drug references, profane gestures,
etc.(not that this is surprising from an Adam Sandler movie). None
of these are useful to the storyline.
Story
This is a romantic comedy
more than just a gross-out flick (making the gross-outs even less
appreciated). The hero is a swinging animal trainer who falls in
love with a girl who has daily amnesia because of an accident she
was in. Every day she wakes up thinking it is the same day and all
heck breaks loose whenever she uncovers the truth. Her family tries
very hard to keep this from happening - basically reenacting the
same day over and over again (it was nice to see that this condition
was not really part of the comedic element of the film). So the
hero must decide whether to live life like this (basically meeting
his love every day for the rest of his life) or move on to other
conquests.
[SPOILER WARNING!]
The
hero decides to keep a video diary for her so that every morning
she can watch it, discover her condition, and catch up on life before
greeting the day. They eventually get married and at the end of
the film we see her meeting her children for the "first"
time. Apparently they lived happily ever after.
Suppositions
The film comes across pretty
naturally. I suppose if all these elements were in place it could
turn out like this. The problem I have is that the movie really
does not present the myriad problems with such a relationship. Imagine
waking up pregnant one day and not even knowing you had a husband?
Imagine "meeting" your kids for the first time when THEY
are parents! You've missed out on everything because all you can
remember is going to bed as a single 20-something in Hawaii. Imagine
the kids lives as the grow up with a mother who never knows who
they are each day. How much time would you spend as her husband
catching her up on life - it would be a 24 hour a day job. I really
do appreciate the sentiment but I am not comfortable with unrealistic
romances. I realize that that is the nature of romance movies -
but I think it sends the typical false message from Hollywood that
"love is enough." Granted the movie does a fine job of
showing true, unconditional love. But let's face it, someday the
hero is going to lose it in a moment of impatience and say, "Look,
I know you don't remember your life and that sucks - but I have
work to do so I can't spend all day telling you stories, and you're
just going to forget it all again tonight anyway!!!" I'm not
saying the movie should have included something like this - and
you know, in a perfect world that never would have happened - but
the movie takes place in the real world and fostering idealistic
expectations of "true love" from other humans can cause
harm as well.
Significance
The message the movie sends
is terrific if unrealistic (at least in this life). True love (not
just romantic love which is pretty much all we actually get to see
here) is patient, kind, long-suffering . . . (hmmm where have I
heard that before???) and the hero in this movie seems to display
them all. Amidst all childish playground humor, the film manages
to pull off a pretty touching story.
|